|
WHY DONT YOU FOLLOW MATTHEW 18?
Updated September 4, 2006 (first published July 2, 2000) (David Cloud, Fundamental Baptist Information Service, P.O. Box 610368, Port Huron, MI 48061, 866-295-4143, fbns@wayoflife.org; for instructions about subscribing and unsubscribing or changing addresses, see the information paragraph at the end of the article) - From time to time I am asked if I follow the guidelines of Matthew 18 before I publish a report. For example, when I published a gentle warning about some of the newer Patch the Pirate music tapes, I received three or four notes from readers asking if I had first approached Majesty Music. Following is one of these:
Another man gave the same sort of challenge in regard to my warnings about Chuck Swindoll:
In reality, Matthew 18 gives instructions for dealing with personal problems between Christians. It does not address how to deal with public teachings and actions by Christian leaders. The apostle Paul, in the Pastoral Epistles, mentioned the names of compromisers and false teachers TEN times, warning Timothy about them. Those letters were not intended merely for Timothy and Titus. They were a part of the canon of Scripture and were a public record. Paul’s motive was not to injure those men. There was nothing malicious in his warnings. His motive was to protect godly preachers and sound churches. Matthew 18 deals with personal trespasses between members of an assembly. Consider exactly what the passage says:
Majesty Music has not trespassed against me individually. Chuck Swindoll has not trespassed against me. That is not the issue here, and it would be impossible to follow Matthew 18 in this situation. Even if I were to attempt to follow the first part of the passage in such a context, it would be impossible to follow the last part. I have no way to take this issue “unto the church.” I am not a member of these men’s churches. Their churches have no authority over me, and I have no business with them (and I am sure they would ignore any attempt I might make to bring accusations against these men). Similarly, these men are not members of my church, so they have no business with it and it has no authority over him. To attempt to follow Matthew 18 in such matters would be confusion. Chuck Swindoll, etc. has published materials and distributed them widely to individuals and churches across the land. I am merely analyzing their published works in obedience to the Word of God. Material that is distributed publicly should be analyzed publicly. Following are some of the Scriptures that give me authority for this practice:
By the way, my personal correspondence with Majesty Music was completely ignored, even though I approached them humbly as a friend who has advertised their music for many years (and continues to do so) without charge. Human nature does not like to be corrected, and the bigger the ministry the more inured it thinks itself to be from criticism. |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||